Beyond the Firewall : Forecasting and Securing Your Firebase-Powered Android App

Since smartphone technology has grown and open source development tools are generous, it increases developers’ interest in creating Android applications. To facilitate developers in making apps, focusing on user experience and app features, they have backend as a service that provides developers with pre-built, managed backend infrastructure. One of the commonly used solutions for backend services in Android applications is Firebase, which is a comprehensive backend as a service platform provided by google. However, this comes with security issues. The connection between Android applications and Firebase can be intercepted by attackers. Developers must ensure that their applications are safe from security threats, predictive risk forecasting, and best practices for improving security.
Although Firebase comes with built-in security features like authentication, developers cannot completely secure their projects by using these default settings alone. The following are some typical security risks that developers need to be mindful of:
- Data Breaches: Unauthorized access due to misconfigured security rules.
- Authentication Bypasses: Weak authentication methods allow attackers to gain access.
- Injection attacks: Malicious input can manipulate the database or APIs.
- Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks: Overloading Firebase services to disrupt app functionality.
- Malware and Reverse Engineering: Breaking or extracting the source code to exploit vulnerabilities.
To identify and deal with security vulnerabilities, developers can apply Threat Modeling techniques. One common approach is the STRIDE Methodology, which helps systematically evaluate potential threats during the app development process.
Threat | Description | Firebase/Android example |
Spoofing | Impersonating something or someone else | Fake user credentials used to log in or manipulate Firebase data. |
Tampering | Modifying data or code | Attackers intercept and alter data exchanged between the app and Firebase. |
Repudiation | Claiming to have not performed the action | A user claims they never performed a data modification, and there are no logs. |
Information Disclosure | Exposing information to someone not authorized to see it | Firebase storage misconfiguration exposes private user data publicly. |
Denial of Service (DoS) | Deny or degrade service to users | Flooding Firebase API calls to exhaust database reads and write limits. |
Elevation of Privilege | Gain capabilities without proper authorization | Exploiting weak security rules to gain admin access to Firebase. |
Why STRIDE is Important for Firebase/Android Apps:
- Identify weaknesses in user authentication and data storage rules.
- Ensure Firebase Security Rules are configured to prevent unauthorized data access.
- Detect areas where data in transit or sensitive operations can be tampered with.
By identifying threats to app components (e.g., login system, database queries, file uploads), developers can start early to prioritize security improvements in the development cycle.
In addition to threat modeling, developers can take advantage of security testing tools to identify vulnerabilities before and after deployment. Below is a breakdown of three essential security testing methods:
- Static Analysis Security Testing (SAST) this technique analyze source code without executing the application to identify potential vulnerabilities. SonarQube is one of SAST tools its versatile programming language and open source platform. Early detection of vulnerabilities minimizes costly fixes later and reduces the risk of exposing security flaws to end-users.
- Dynamic Analysis Security Testing (DSAT) different form Static A nalysis Security Testing, it analyze application while it’s running. Give simulated real-world attacks to see the application responds. OWASP ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) reveals vulnerabilities that may not be visible through static code analysis, such as issues arising from user inputs and API interactions.
- Penetration testing with Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) designed specifically for mobile application penetration that assist simulating real-world attacks by ethical hacker or penetration tester.
Combining STRIDE Threat Modeling with SAST, DAST, and Penetration Testing creates a comprehensive security approach.
- STRIDE helps predict potential threats during development.
- SAST helps prevent vulnerabilities at the source code level.
- DAST and Penetration Testing help validate defenses in a live environment.
Firebase makes it easier to design Android apps’ backends, but security should never be neglected. Developers must be mindful of threats including injection attacks, authentication bypasses, and data breaches and actively assess risks using the STRIDE technique. OWASP ZAP, SonarQube, and MobSF are examples of security testing tools that developers may use to identify and address vulnerabilities throughout the app lifetime. In the end, creating safe and dependable Firebase-integrated Android apps requires a combination of threat modelling, testing, and ongoing monitoring.
Reference :
Holla, S., & Katti, M. M. (2012). Android based mobile application development and its security. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, 3(3), 486-490.
Khawas, C., & Shah, P. (2018). Application of firebase in android app development-a study. International Journal of Computer Applications, 179(46), 49-53.
Ma, L., Gu, L., & Wang, J. (2014). Research and development of mobile application for android platform. International journal of multimedia and ubiquitous engineering, 9(4), 187-198.
Sarkar, A., Goyal, A., Hicks, D., Sarkar, D., & Hazra, S. (2019, December). Android application development: a brief overview of android platforms and evolution of security systems. In 2019 Third International conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud)(I-SMAC) (pp. 73-79). IEEE.
Tyagi, S., Vishwakarma, A., Siddhant, Sirohi, S., & Singh, Y. (2024, February). Enhancing the Security of Web Application Using Firebase Auth. In International Conference On Innovative Computing And Communication (pp. 491-505). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.